About your Search

20121001
20121031
STATION
FOXNEWSW 101
FOXNEWS 99
CNNW 34
CNN 32
FBC 32
MSNBC 25
MSNBCW 25
CSPAN 5
KPIX (CBS) 5
CSPAN2 4
KNTV (NBC) 3
WBAL (NBC) 3
KQED (PBS) 2
WRC (NBC) 2
WTTG 2
( more )
LANGUAGE
English 390
Search Results 0 to 49 of about 390 (some duplicates have been removed)
. >> thanks? >> coming up, fox news asked jay carney point blank if the administration meant to mislead you about the benghazi attack. we will check in with michelle malkin. and steve wynnn unleashes on president obama and his business policies. [ ryan ] it doesn't get any better than endless shrimp at red lobster. u can mix and match all day! [ male announcer ] don't miss red lobster's endless shrimp, just $14.99! try as mu as you like, an way you like! like parmesan crusted shrimp. hurry in, offer ends soon! i'm ryan isabell and i see food differently. hurry in, offer ends soon! customer erin swenson bought so, i'm happy. today. sales go up... i'm happy. it went out today... i'm happy. what if she's not home? (together) she won't be happy. use ups! she can get a text alert, reroute... even reschedule her package. it's ups my choice. are you happy? i'm happy. i'm happy. i'm hi'm happy. i'm happy. i'm happy. happy. happy. happy. happy. (together) happy. i love logistics. then don't miss sleep train's wbest rest event.st ever? you'll find sleep train's very best mattresses at the guaranteed
alert. developments concerning libya. within just the last hour, the white house challenged jay carney on remarks from the press conference last night that made news. the exchanges got pretty heated. we will have those for you shortly. a live report from ed henry. in the meantime, there is questions about recent comments from the obama campaign involving the terrorist attacks on the u.s. consulate in libya. obama for america deputy campaign manager, stephanie cutter, going on cnn, suggesting that the recent focus in this country on libya in the murder of four americans is being driven entirely by campaign trail politics. >> you know, in terms of the politicization of this, we are here at a debate and i hope we get to talk about the debate. but the entire reason that this has become the political topic that it is is because of mitt romney and paul ryan. it is a big part of their stump speech. it is reckless and irresponsible. megyn: some liberal commentators slammed that remark. remember, ports, four americans were killed in an attack, including chris stevens, even some top senate democ
was lying, that jay carney was lying, that hillary clinton was lying and susan rice was lying and anybody else from the regime who went out and tried to blame what happened to our ambass dar at benghazi and in cairo on this video, were lying, big lifetime. >> obama, shortly after the attack, told "60 minutes" that regarding mitt romney's response to the attacks, specifically in egypt, the president said that romney has a tendency to shoot first and aim later. given the fact that so much was made out of the video, that apparently has absolutely nothing to do with the attack on benghazi, that there wasn't even a protest outside of benghazi post, didn't president obama shoot first and aim later? >> first of all, jake, i think your assessment of what we know now is not complete. this is a moving picture. and people who on the night of an attack, or the day after claim they know all the facts... without making clear that what we know is based on preliminary information, are not being straight. and they're, in some cases, trying to politicize a situation that should not be politicized. >> given
for security, who is the we? jay carney cleared that up. >> he was speaking directly for himself and the president, he meant the white house. >> if the president and the vice president, the white house didn't know about the security requests, then who is to blame for the security lapse in libya on september 11th? jay carney again. >> i want to be clear, it was never in the presidential daily brief or anything like that. >> i am not going to sit and talk to you about this. i'm not, ed. i'm saying matters of how many personnel are assigned to embassies and consulates are not decided at the white house. they are decided at the state department. >> they are decided at the state department. is it possible that the president didn't know about the request? the answer to that question is yes. but passing the buck may not add up, for two reasons. in a press release on september 10th, the president heard from key national security opinion pals on preparedness and security posture on the eve of the 11th anniversary of september 11th to protect the american people, both at home and abroad. n
? >> bret: ed, to be clear, the white house press secretary jay carney said in a few hours the organization itself mari ansar al-sharia clad it had not been responsible. but again, alihani al horazi is being held by tunisian authorities hasn't is tied to ansar al-sharia. >> right. and senator chamblss saying this is the only person in custody and he is tied to that al-qaeda affiliated group. so the bottom line is while there were conflicting reports about whether or notbe the group was claiming responsibility for a terror attack, someone connected to that group is now in custody. related to the terror attack. >> bret: only one. ed, thank you. the attack on the consulate in libya triggered a wide array of moves by the pentagon. help never arrived an four americans as you heard clouding the u.s. ambassador were killed. national security correspondent jennifer griffin looks at that part of the story. >> reporter: shortly after the attack began, unarmed u.s. predator drone positioned over benghazi. six hours and 20 minutes after the attack started, former seals tyrone woods and glen doherty wer
about islam film. as well as this claim by white house spokesman jay carney on september 18. our initial information, that includes all information, we saw no evidence to back up claims by others that this was a preplanned, or premeditated attack, that we saw evidence it was sparked by the reaction to the video. >> today, carney downplayed the e-mails noting they include nonclassified information called from social -- culled from social media flights telling reporters aboard air force one -- >> i and others made very clear that our preliminary statements were preliminary and an investigation was underway and as more facts became available we would make the american people aware of them. >> today, secretary of state hillary clinton backed up the white house account. >> posting something on facebook is not in and of itself evidence. i think it is under scores how fluid the reporting was at the time and continued for some time to be. >> carney added later the al-qaeda affiliated group claimed not to be involved in the attack. the only suspect now in custody in the terror attack is a member
that. i never said we don't know-- >>> oh, really? jay carney is taken t ton eeni ilec with liz cheney and michelle malkin this. friday, i make my big-screen debut in at lat shrug, part 2, we have anique peek. the full clip coming upater theho i know the name of eight princesses. i'm an expert on softball. and tea parties. i'll have more awkward conversations than i'm equipped for because i'm raising two girls my own. mohafeme fohe g. itorm, so i've found a way. who matters most to you says the most about you. ssmutual is owned by our policyholders so they matter most to us. massmutual. we'll help y gethere >> sean: "hannity" goes hollywood, a brand-new movie, hits movie theaters this friday. here is a sneak peek. >> railroad doesn't function as a charity, edd kill to 93. >> henry reardon is a hereee. he's an innovator. he's a job creator? i sit down th the producers of atlas shru part 2 and the rest of my mieebutin u i ve a cold, and i tookyquil, t i'stilstubup leou ]th t i'stilstubup ny d't ufure. at leou ] -sers id gels speeds relief to your worst cold symptoms plus has a decong
, it's the way it is. henry, i want to talk to you about the little dustup you had with jay carney about libya. i used it in my talking points memo. we were laying out the time line and how the administration really booted the whole thing. let's watch henry and jay carney. go. >> did you and others mislead the public because you didn't want to admit there was a terrorist attack? >> absolutely not. the president of the united states referred to it as an act of terror immediately after it occurred. >> then why were you at the podium for several days saying we don't know if it's terrorism. >> i never said that. i never said that. there was an issue about the definition of terrorism. this is an act of terrorism. the president made clear. >> bill: okay. i don't think the president made anything clear. when you hear stuff like that, you got to still be respectful. you can't say like, hey you pinhead, come on. we know what you did. why don't you just admit it? that's what i would say. what did you think of it? >> i stick to the facts and the bottom line is, you know, that what jay carney
? for a full week after the attack when jay carney was asked about it on the 13th, he didn't use the word, terror. susan rice -- on the 17th, the spokeswoman asked if she regarded it as an act of terrorism, i don't think we know enough. then on september 25th on "the view" when the president was asked about it, he said there's no doubt the ongoing assault, that it wasn't just a mob action, which was still unclear. why what appears to be a real hesitancy to use the formal words? >> i think it was a recognition that this was an extraordinarily complicated situation in benghazi. it was difficult to get accurate information and what precise ly went on. in fact, that's why the president, actually, the secretary of state, calleded on ak bass dor thomas pickering to conduct a formal inquiry. >> why did they say it was linked to a movie? >> here's the situation. one, there was a hour long attack if you will on the legation in benghazi. it was clear and the president said the day after, this was an act of terror. this was not an accidental occurrence. it wasn't, and i don't think he made any refer
spokesperson jay carney did not assess the situation correctly to the public. talking points believes carney and rice were told by the public what to say but by whom? that is the question that brian williams should have asked. because president obama has to know the answer to that it is unconceivable that he doesn't. let me repeat. if you ask president obama who told ambassador rice and jay carney to tell the world that a stupid videotape launched the attack, the president has to answer the question but no one will ask him. for my it's incredibly frustrating. i sat there waiting for governor romney, bob schieffer and now brian williams to ask mr. obama a very simple question. it wasn't asked. going forward, the president will most likely avoid the libyan issue entirely and hope the voters don't care. one more thing. all administrations make mistakes from george washington to abraham lincoln to franklin roosevelt. all presidents have presided over screwups. just tell the folks the truth, mr. president. tell us what you know. and who you are holding responsible for this mess. and that's the me
nothing about this request for security, who is the we? well, jay carney, the white house spokesman in a white house briefing today cleared that up. >> he was speaking directly for himself and for the president. he meant the white house. >> so, if the president and the vice president, the white house, didn't know about the security request, then who is to blame for the security lapse in libya on september 11th? jay carney again. >> i just want to be clear. it was never in the presidential daily brief or anything like that. >> i'm not going to sit and talk to you about this. >> the detail. >> no, i'm not. i'm saying matters of how many personnel are assigned to embassies and consulates and other diplomats facilities are not decided at the white house. they're decideded at the state department. >> they are decided at the state department. is it possible that the president and vice president did not know about the request for more security prior to the attack in ben gghazi? the answer is yes. but passing the buck may not add up. for two reasons. first, in a press release on september 1
. >> there is no justification for responding to this video with violence. >> white house press secretary jay carney blames the video the next day. >> the protests were reaction in to a video. we have no information it was a preplanned attack. >> and later that day, at the transfer of remains known at joint base andrews, clinton talks again about the video. >> we've seen rage and violence directed at american embassies over an awful internet video that we had nothing to do with. >> the father of one of those killed later tells fox news clinton told him personally they were going to arrest and prosecute the producer of the video. next day, september 15th, california authorities haul a man who produced the video in for questioning and march him in front of tv cameras. september 16th. u.s. ambassador to the united nations susan rice goes on five sunday talk shows repeating the same story each time. >> there was not a premeditated attack. what happened any initially it was a spontaneous reaction to what had transpired in cairo as a consequence of the video. >> they panicked. >> former white house chief of staf
, as jay carney pointed out, he was on the wrong side. he was not in favor of getting rid of gadhafi. you have these weak fragmented states, it's not clear what romney would do to assist these weak states to keep them from falling apart. >> eliot: in romney's speech, early in the speech he said and he goes on at some length after the attack this is in bengahzi, tens of thousands of libyans held a massive protest against the extremists who murdered the ambassador, even in an odd way there is internal inconsistency in his speech. he said because of what we did we brought democracy and those who launched the attack are the fringe element, and then he goes on to say we didn't-- >> this is a like a thankful obama moment? they brought the u.s. in. >> eliot: is there an analogy on this and iraq? >> this was a hit on the embassy. they know where the safe house is. this is an inside job. this is similar to what we're seeing in afghanistan. where we have 51 visors killedder. i was in iraq as an adviser. intervention in libya is complicated. although it may look a certain way right now the problem f
. >> there is no justification, none at all. to respond with violence. lou: september 14th jay carney insist the attack was spurred by the patio, the demonstrations and it was spontaneous nothing to do with terrorism. >> these protests were in reaction to a video that had spread to the region. with no information to suggest it was preplanned or not in reaction to 9/11. lou: the ambassador of stevens and three other americans were met at andrews air force base later that morning. the secretary of state repeated the false claims that sources told us were false. >> we saw rage and violence directed at the embassy over internet video we had nothing to do with. it is hard for the american people to make sense of that. it is senseless. lou: the white house has not explained it was a terrorist attack why they would dispatch on sunday, our ambassador to the united nations, susan rice to appear on five talk-show said. she repeats the attack was spontaneous and born of a video protest. >> the best and permission and assessment the have today this was not preplanned your premeditated. initially, a reaction to wh
for an attack on embassy tripoli. seven days after the attacks, jay carney was denying any evidence of a terrorist attack, despite the real-time audio and video of the attack, despite the statement that the cia station chief, despite the statements from u.s. officials in libya and the libyan government statement from the very beginning that it was a terrorist attack. here is jay carney. >> i will tell you, based on the information, our initial information, and that includes all information, we saw no evidence to back up claims by others that this was a preplanned were premeditated attack. but we saw evidence that it was sparked by the reaction to this video. lou: concrete evidence. well, the secretary of state hillary clinton returned to the public eye and one parent principal purpose. the secretary defended the administration, despite all of the evidence against it are the choices it made and the charges that they did not act to stop the murders of four americans. secretary clinton tried to dismiss those e-mails as credible evidence. we will hear her statement shortly. the obama ad
's his story. then why, number one, did jay carney, susan rice, a whole series of officials and victoria newlin when james rosen was pressing her at the state department say, it's too early -- megyn: we don't know enough. president obama on "the view," to letterman, it's under investigation. >> number two, days later you had james clapper, the director of national intelligence, put out this late friday statement late in september clarifying that the intelligence had changed and that's why susan rice and others were not sure early on and thought maybe it was the video, but now we have more intelligence suggesting it's terror. you don't issue a clarification days later from the director of national intelligence if the commander in chief has already declared it's terror, right if why would you need that clarification if they're saying, let's clarify, it's terror -- megyn: so -- >> i don't mean to interrupt, but if it was terror, why then did the president hours later go to las vegas for a campaign event? if he believed it was terrorism and four people had just died, you would think whether
carne carney -- henry asked jay carney if the administration was straightforward about what happened. >> did out or others mislead the public because you didn't want to admit there was a terror attack? >> absolutely not. president of the united states referred to it as act of terror after it occurred. two, kennedy, the under-secretary of state management is testifying in public today. i look to what he says before your cameras and the american people rather than what the congressional sources may be telling you. >> if you are citing that president used act of terror why were you at the podium for several days saying we don't know if it's terrorism. >> i never said. that i never said we don't know it's terrorism. >> dana: that is a who's on first briefing. you did say it. no, i didn't. i did. it was terror. you watched the whole thing on capitol hill. it didn't get any better. >> eric: the problem is jay carney is lying to the american people. the man did say that he blamed the movie. the day after, hillary clinton came out and said the movie, following day. it was the movie. day five
a briefing with reporters for the this time in two weeks. it's expected to come -- jay carney going to the podium. as you have been watching, house lawmakers are holding their own hearing about what went wrong. let, listen in to jay carney. >> i have great faith the washington nationals will recover. and hopefully win. alisyn: we'll listen when things are important that he's talking about. but one witness at the house committee is already testifying the security at the u.s. consulate in benghazi was woefully inadequate. this follows a powerful denial from the state department earlier. officials say they never concluded that the deadly attack was quota spontaneous reaction to that anti-islam film. you may remember that was a claim echoed by some within the administration several days after intelligence suggested that that was not the case. chief intelligence correspondent catherine herridge is here. tell us the most interesting things you have heard. >> we have had testimony that the consulate in been gatsy as well as at main embassy in tripoli did not meet what are called the inman
as press secretary jay carney fielded a barrage of questions about the attack in libya that ended in the death of ambassador stevens and three other americans. they pressed mr. carney on why it's taken so long to get definitive answers. >> reporter: how is it determined to use these assessments, preliminary or not, even though they turn out to be wrong? isn't there some concern -- >> we live in a society that values transparency. this is an administration that values transparency. we had a -- we had -- >> reporter: for our benefit, even if they turned out to be wrong? >> the judgment you're making. what we are saying is when asked what happened, we gave our assessments based on the information we had at the time. >> and the silver fox joins us now live from the white house. mike, despite carney repeating his assertion the administration divulged details of this attack as they came in, why were reporters like yourself not prepared to buy it? >> reporter: well, i think most people are willing to stipulate to places like benghazi are very dangerous areas, our foreign service and dipl
sure that he does the homework and gets ready for the second debate. take a listen to how jay carney yesterday described vice president biden's performance in thursday night's debate against paul ryan. take a listen now. >> i took extreme pleasure in watching the debate last night because of the way that he demonstrated his passion and his wisdom and the joy that he brings to the job of serving the american people as vice president and of working with this president to bring about positive change for the middle class and for this country. >> reporter: what is significant about that is you hear jay carney going on and on about the passion and joy that vice president biden brought to his performance. democrats in private have been imploring the president to bring that kind of passion and zip on tuesday night at hofstra. that is the pressure on him is to do just that, harris. >> even the president himself alluded to the fact that there is things he wants to do differently. how will he do that? what will it look like? >> reporter: you can expect him to be a bit mor more aggressivd maybe
raises questions about two days after ambassador rice's tv appearances jay carney was at the white house podium again saying in his words saying there was concrete evidence that this was tied to the video, suggesting it was not a terror attack. today jay carney when asked about that he said quote i and others made very clear that our preliminary assessments were preliminary, that investigation was underway and as more facts became available we would make the american people aware of them. but it's interesting, jay carney went on to say that this al qaeda affiliated group, they later claimed they had nothing to do with the terror attacks. he says there is competing claims. the top republic on the senate intelligence committee notes that al qaeda affiliated group one of their members is the only suspect currently in custody for that terror attack. is he in custody overseas, suggesting this al qaeda group did have something to do with it, shep. >> shepard: ed, this comes during the president's battleground states blitz with just 13 days to go. >> absolutely. he is doing six battleground sta
that day, so why jay carney is pushing that today. and if you wonder if that's just the state department saying that last night. go to the testimony today and you find out from t tesmony toy byhe sepen eye ngveio th esy t n, i e. so for what is jay carney -- why is he still doing this? >> i think it's the president's view that it was the video. at's why i think it's ideology. look, i understandeople say the aisioyith a cup wi ciet w coverup buzz that would acknowledge that they understood reality. it was inconvenient and they were trying to obscure it. i fear it's more the ideology -- >> greta: but ideology has to thisfaug tme sofac eid- h aino ith the video in the state department. they say, at 8:30 at night when the ambassador went outside, there is nothing unusual. there has been nothing unusual during the day all outside. where does presint o get e vire l ahi qio onm s dtmto the white house? before the white house started talking through jay carny and through others and through, as carney says, the administrationwide assessment, hiest iothow long thates? g: ea tta department knew on
having people brush this aside. >> reporter: here at the white house, press secretary jay carney defended biden on that front. but he also seemed to over and over point folks to the state department. and hillary clinton didn't exactly get into the back and forth but did admit there were questions on both sides, take a listen. >> it is certainly not the case that the assignment of security personnel at diplomatic facilities is made here at the white house. nor should it be. the decision is made about requests for security personnel, and security matters, they're made at the state department. >> to this day, to this day, we do not have a complete picture. we do not have all of the answers. no one in this administration has ever claimed otherwise. >> reporter: you know, brian, senior officials do admit to me they wish they had a clean explanation, they don't. intelligence officials are still uncovering evidence that leads them to believe that the attack in benghazi was somewhat spontaneous, meaning it was never planned in advance, but was opportunistic, meanwhile, nobody is satisfied with th
Search Results 0 to 49 of about 390 (some duplicates have been removed)